The Lottery
Student’s name
Institutional affiliation
Instructor
Date
The Lottery
The lottery characterizes every act, conduct, and even idea that is approved down from one generation to the succeeding and which is accepted and followed unhesitatingly, without considering how inconsistent, strange, or unpleasant it could be. It is a custom, a yearly ceremonial activity that nobody has tried to question. From the Shirley Jackson’s short story, the theme of anachronistic tradition have been displayed as portrayed in this essay.
The community lottery concludes in a ferocious killing every year, a strange ceremony that advocates how risky tradition could be once people follow it carelessly. Before we know what kind of lottery they’re conducting, the residents in the village and their arrangements appears harmless, even charming. They have chosen a fairly pitiful gentleman to lead the lottery, and youngsters ride around gathering shingles in the town square. Every person seems anxious with a comical appearance. The lottery comprises of little other than handmade gaffes of rag. Custom is widespread to minor towns, a way to link relatives and peers. Jackson, though, thrusts hovels in the admiration that societies partake for belief. She points out that the inhabitants do not actually recognize greatly about the origin of the lottery though they try to reserve the ritual nonetheless.
The residents’ blind reception of the lottery has permitted ceremonial killing to develop in their town drapery. As they have confirmed, they feel incapable to adjust or even attempt to change anything, though there is nobody driving them to retain things the same. “Aged Man Warner is so faithful to the tradition that he fears the villagers will return to primitive times if they stop holding the lottery” (Jackson, 2017, P 189-213) . These normal persons, who have recently come from work or from their families and will shortly get back home for lunch, simply murder somebody once they are demanded to. And they do not have a good motive for undertaking it apart from the detail that they have constantly performed a lottery to murder an individual. If the villagers desisted to inquire it, they would be required to question themselves why they are compelling a murder but no one stops to ask. For them, the fact that this is ritual is a good reason enough and offers them all the defense they require.
Villagers oppress persons at random, and the target is guilty of no wrongdoing apart from drawing the mistaken blunder of paper from a carton. The extravagant ceremony of the lottery is planned in such a way so that all villagers have equal chances of becoming the victims even offspring are at a high danger. Every year, somebody new is selected and murdered, and no single family that is safe at all. Whatever that makes the Lottery very alarming is the rapidity with which the villagers go in contradiction of the target person. The instant that Tessie Hutchinson picks the marked slip of paper, she loses her character as a common house girl (Jackson, 2017, P 162). Her associates and family take part in the murder with as much interest as every other person in the squad. Tessie fundamentally becomes indiscernible to them in the passion of harassment. Though she has done anything “wrong,” her guiltlessness does not matter. She has drawn the marked paper and therefore she has herself become distinct and as per the logic of the lottery, she therefore must be killed.
The author of the Lottery is trying to clearly indicate that one should not follow traditions carelessly just because that they are traditions. In the story, Tessie Hutchinson doesn’t speak out in contradiction of the lottery or try to alter the status quo until she herself is affected. When she tries to say the practice is not just, it’s too late for her or anyone else to speak out.
References
Bouskila, Y. (2019). Just Checking. Pennsylvania Literary Journal, 11(1), 203-317.
Pojprasat, S. (2017). A Re-Criticism of The Lottery. 25(49), 189-213.
