Many people believe ethics is being morally correct or incorrect

Name

Professor

Course

Date

Introduction

Many people believe ethics is being morally correct or incorrect. But in summary, professional ethics is the ability, to know what is correct and incorrect in the places of work. This is in consideration to the services rendered by the organization. To encourage professional ethics, many organizations have made rules in the places of work that help to guide the workers of what should be done. Work ethics are essential for employees to work in peace and enjoy a serene working environment.

The failure to follow the rules of conduct, by the organization could lead to low production, or the production coming to a halt, the workers might not also enjoy the work, examples of work place ethics comprised of work attendance, the ability to work as a team, appearance, level of production, the employees loyalty, integrity, accountability, and dependability. Values are the things that one considers as significant (Kvale 120). Some values contain various characteristics like, compassionate nature, reliability; professional values are the ones that the employee share in the organization, to help the employees to do what is right (Wendleton, 220). When putting into practice another person’s ethics, they must judge what the most significant values means to them. After deliberating and identifying the most significant values to them, they can reflect on the values related to their career choice (Kvale 150). The organization might be looking for an individual with the traits to feel a certain post. An organization may want persons with traits such as kindness, appreciation, firmness, antagonism, esteem, and friendships.

A person who poses and shows professional ideals, and moral values can advance their career in a variety of ways. If an organization has put down clear rules on the code of conduct in the organization, the employees working within the organization should use the opportunity to advance their career, by proving that they can be depended on, hard working, and motivated may bring them success (Wendleton, 220). If an employee is given a task to work on by the employer, then the employee decides to work at night to ensure the completion of the work on time, it might show the employer how committed the employee is, and how much they want to move up the organization’s ladder through dedication. If the employee can show that they have an idea, of what the organization advocates for, and can depict that to the employer then the employee can gain lots of respect from the employer that can bring about promotion of the employee. It is constantly significant, to bear in mind that whenever an employer wants to promote an employee, the employer looks at the employees previous performance, responsibilities, and the pecking order.

Interrogation

Questioning, a possible suspect entails using a variety of skills. Cross-examination is naturally challenging (Wendleton, 280). The detective cross-examining the possible suspect would need to suppress the anger within the possible suspect, avoid war of words, and make the possible suspect open up to him to get additional information (Kvale 120). The purpose for an interrogation is for the detective to get more information from the suspect than to create tension (Wendleton, 290). In that case, the detective should consider the questions they ask the suspect. The first time a suspect is brought the questions that they should ask the suspect are questions like, asking the suspect what he likes doing during free time, the suspect’s hobbies, and even how the family is doing. These questions are to unnerve the suspect and make the suspect open up to the detective. After that, the detective can ask questions about the case. Asking the suspect where they were at a certain time, the persons they were with, and if the people the suspect mentioned can support the suspect’s story beyond any reasonable doubt (Kvale 170).

During the cross-examination, three detectives should be present, one would be investigating the alibi to prove if they are saying the truth, and the other two will be asking questions to the suspect. Another significant part of cross-examination is looking at the body language of the suspect as it can help to check if the suspect is saying the truth. Basic skills of telling whether a person is lying or not, can be gained by carrying out frequent interrogation. The daily interaction with different kinds of people can help one to tell when one is lying by looking at the body language (Kvale 120). That experience gained by looking at people’s behavior can be applied during interrogation.

Conclusion

Organizations are forever determined to display what they can offer and their exceptional competence. If one sabotages the organization in anyway, it could bring about the termination of employment of the person. For example, if an organization decides that employing the minorities is their priority in order to bring uniformity. The person responsible for hiring the organization employees should do as instructed, even if the person does not like the idea. If the employee allows personal principles, to come before the organizations principles then the employee would be jeopardizing their job. Every employee should always remember that professional ethics is of tremendous importance to them and organizations which they work for.

Work cited

Kvale, Steinar. Doing interviews. London: SAGE Publications, 2007. Print

Wendleton, Kate. Getting interviews. Franklin Lakes, N.J.: Career Press, 2000. Print.