methodological_issues_article_review

Communication Disorder

Student Name

Introduction

Evidence-based practice in an approach that is interdisciplinary to clinical practice that started gaining grounds following the time it was introduced in 1992. It is usually defined in three principles that are considered to be very basic.

The evidence that is the best bearing on whether why a treatment can work. The expertise of the clinic to identify each of the unique heath state and diagnosis of the patients, their personal risks and the benefits of potential interventions then finally the values and preference of the patient(Bauer 2007).

It entails the making of decisions about how to go about in promoting the necessary health care and by forming an integration between the best available evidence with the practitioner expertise and the resources that are readily available.

And with those characteristics needs state values and other preferences of type people whom will intern be affected. It is usually done in a manner that is compatible with the environmental and organizational context. The evidence can be referred to as the as the research finding that is derived from the systematic collection of the data through the use of observation and other experiment and the final formulation of questions and the testing of different hypothesis.

The practice-based evidence is a kind of approach to treatment and supports approaches that are derived from and the supportive of the cultural attributes and the traditions and the local society. These cultural attributes must be positive. It is usually effected by people such as the local community through the censors of the community and addresses the therapeutic and healing needs of the families and individuals a framework that is cultural and specific (Brendro and Mitchelle 2011).

The practitioners usually draw the upon the knowledge of the culture and tradition of the treatment that are very respect full and responsive to the definition of the of the dysfunction and wellness.

Methodological challenges that are unique to psychological research investigating effective treatments for psychological disorders.

There are several methodological issues that are usually associated with the research that is psychologically based and is investigating the treatment that is effective for the various psychological disorders. The methods are usually expensive and at times involve a lot of time and money that is used in the identification and treatment of one particular individual.

The individuals usually at some point have different needs that each needs to be handled. The other issue that is of much importance here refers to the relative applicability of the concepts of the methods that are used to treat the diseases. The methods are not universally applied. It is so because different patients have different needs that need to look into in its way using different criteria.

The methodology also has the challenge of acceptability since some people with psychological disorders do not readily accept to be applied for some methods that are used in the treatment of such conditions that make it a big problem in the general application.

Treatment modality associated with a disorder in the DSM-5 and present at least one

The example of treatment modality that is associated will be discussed is associated with the communication disorder that (Psychology today n.d) . Its diagnosis involves the some people being put on PDD-NOS under the MSM –IV.

Those people with such kinds of disorders are usually having the deficit of in the use of the social communication cues such as the non-verbal and the verbal cues that are usually used in communication. Some of them, however, do not replicate the pattern of behavior and the fixated interest that is required for the ASD (Dozois 2013).

The findings of the research.

The research had it that some of the patients with that kind of the disorder do not necessarily display it frequently. The always at one point in their life tend to focus much on reducing their communication for fear of the negative reprimands that they may get. The treatment, however, must be concerned with looking into the various approaches that can be used in its maintenance because the individual must a consistently be made to practice the use of speech something that is consistently referred to as the speech therapy. They treatment also must focus on using models that help them in the utilization of various nonverbal communication techniques.

The evidence model dictates that the practitioner must use the unique characteristics to find the best diagnosis for the treatment at hand. In this case, the medical practitioner will look into the patients to identify the various disorders as they display them. In the normal setting then come up with a framework of well-documented behavior pattern that need to be looked into the model works in that it will give the evidence that is required for effective treatment to be attained (Medipline Plus n.d).

After getting the evidence, the necessary process of diagnosis follows with the an attempt to administer the correct treatment in a procedural manner.

In the practice based evidence, the medical practitioner will rely on the experience they have regarding that condition and providing the necessary diagnosis of the speech disorder as they rely on the pre-informed knowledge of how they had handled a previous case.

To conclude, it is clear that the two different methods usually contribute much to the treatment of the psychological disorders that affect patients. The most recommendable method in my opinion is the evidence-based model since it involves signaling one a specific case that requires treatment and giving it that necessary approach with some modifications which is on the contrary with the other method that requires a practitioner to use that information that they have to the diagnosis of another patient. Each patient usually has their different individual needs.

Reference

Bauer, R.M. (2007). Evidence-based practice in psychology: Implications for research and research training. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(7), 685–694. Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Brendtro, L.K., Mitchell, M.L., & Doncaster, J. (2011). Practice-based evidence: Back to the future . Reclaiming Children and Youth, 19(4), 5-7. Retrieved from the ProQuest database.

Dozois, D.J.A. (2013). Psychological treatments: Putting evidence into practice and practice into evidence. Canadian Psychology, 54(1), 1-11. Retrieved from the ProQuest database.

Psychology today(n.d) Educational disorder Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/conditions/communication-disordersMediline Plus (n.d) speech communication disorder retrieved from https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/speechandcommunicationdisorders.html