THE DOMINANCE EFFECT WITHIN THE GROUP IN EMOTION RECOGNITION
Student’s Name
Corse and Code
Instructor’s Name
Date of Submission
Abstract
The research report seeks to investigate whether there is a dominance effect within the group in emotion recognition. To answer this question, a qualitative research approach is the most suitable method. Emotion recognition is a phrase used in psychology to describe the process of detecting how someone is feeling based on their appearance and voice. Nonverbal signals include facial and vocal expressions, postures, and gestures that are utilized by senders or those showing emotions to communicate how they are feeling to the receiver. In many cases, when you examine human emotions in a variety of methods, such as via literature or physiology, or through audio or video, the accuracy with which you recognize emotions increases. The information included in facial expressions, physical movement and gestures, and voice may be used to distinguish between different types of emotions. It is more probable that individuals who share the same cultural background as those expressing their thoughts will be able to relate with them. The research favors the dialect theory of emotion in explaining the relationship between the dominance effect within an in-group setting.
1 Introduction
In the study of cross-cultural emotion identification, the debate has been settled on the merits of universality vs variation of expression. Cross-cultural research on emotion recognition are now largely in agreement on the occurrence of both universality and variety in the recognition of emotional responses. Individuals’ accuracy in judging the facial expressions of persons from their own cultural background is higher than their accuracy in evaluating the facial expressions of people from diverse cultural backgrounds in general. How does a single individual have such a significant impact on a group? The dialectic theory of emotion may hold the key to finding a solution. In terms of how research on the dominance effect should be undertaken, there is considerable disagreement among the members of the group. It is critical to develop research methodologies and to look more closely at the distinctions between the dominance impact on group and the dominant impact on group of multiple identification cues in terms of individual personality characteristics or emotional dimensions for future study in order to make more informed decisions.
2. Literature review
Emotion recognition is a phrase used in psychology to describe the process of detecting how someone is feeling based on their appearance and voice. Nonverbal signals include facial and vocal expressions, postures, and gestures that are utilized by senders or those showing emotions to communicate how they are feeling to the receiver. Since the 1960s, researchers have demonstrated that the ability to experience emotions is present in all people. According to psychologists, the six basic human emotions are happiness, anger, fear, sorrow, disgust, and surprise (Elfenbein & Ambady, 2002a; Beaupré & Hess, 2006). Happiness, anger, fear, sorrow, disgust, and surprise are the six essential human emotions. Other psychologists, on the other hand, contend that emotions are learnt and culturally diverse, and that this cultural variation is represented in facial expressions and emotional inferences. Mistakes have been made in the study’s methodology as well as its sample selection and the presentation of emotional stimuli (Brooks, 1994). In recent years, there has been an increase in the integration of emotion perception, with psychologists increasingly recognizing the concept of in-group advantage, which allows for both cross-cultural universality and heterogeneity to exist simultaneously (Biehl et al., 1997). If we use this method, we may be able to gain a greater understanding of the cultural differences and similarities that people display when recognizing facial emotions.
The in group’s dominance and overpowering impact is explained by the dialectic theory of emotion. This theory combines classical research and modern emotion theories in one framework to improve cross-cultural emotional communication. We want to present and analyze the dominance effect in groups and its theory in this article, and we also intend to do more study into the dominance effect in groups’ prospective research routes in the future months.
An increasing number of studies have revealed evidence of a dominant effect in groups, which has piqued the interest of psychologists and has been investigated from a range of perspectives. To uncover the six basic facial expressions shared by African, Chinese, and French Canadians, researchers Beaupré and Hess (2006) performed a study with twenty participants from each of these three ethnic groups. According to the findings of this study, participants felt more at ease when the photographer and subject had a comparable cultural background while measuring their feelings. Because people have different levels of self-confidence when reading facial expressions, the intra-group dominance effect may be seen to be present. Research subjects for the research, which was carried out by Wickline et al., included a varied group of students from a variety of ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds (2009). Each participant was given the assignment of comparing African-Americans and European-Americans visually as well as verbally. The expression of emotions on the face is possible. According to the findings, European American students were more accurate at detecting American facial expressions and voices than African American students, who were less accurate.
3. Method
The current research paper will employ a qualitative approach. Specifically, secondary research will be used to support an action research-centered approach. In the action research approach, the secondary data will be used to link theories to practice in an attempt to understand social changes. To improve understanding of concepts, opinions, or experiences, qualitative research involves gathering and evaluating non-numerical data (for example, text, video, or audio) from many sources. The approach may be used to obtain a better understanding of a topic and to produce fresh ideas for further investigation into the subject. The goal of qualitative research is to gain a better understanding of how individuals perceive their surroundings. When it comes to data analysis, qualitative research is differentiated by its ability to adapt to a range of conditions while retaining a rich store of information.
The research question used for this research is whether there is a dominance effect within the group in emotion recognition. To answer this question, a qualitative research approach is the most suitable method. When it comes to effective interpersonal communication, emotional facial expressions are a critical component. It is the ability to recognize emotions that underpins the ability model of emotional intelligence, empathetic feelings, and prosocial action prediction, among other things. An approach that captures human emotions will be required.
In qualitative research, an interpretive and naturalistic approach to the subject is taken into consideration. Several advantages may be gained via the use of qualitative research methodologies and procedures. Starting with a detailed (in-depth) account of participants’ ideas, views, and experiences, as well as an analysis of the relevance of the actions taken by those participants, qualitative research is an excellent place to get started. Qualitative study results, as Choy (2014) discovered, provide a precise and thorough picture of the relationship between information processing and performance. Generally speaking, qualitative methodologies are employed in the design, administration, and interpretation of language assessments, as agreed upon by Kelle (2006).
Another issue is that qualitative research (interpretivism) may be able to give a more complete knowledge of human experience in specific settings. According to Kelle, it is a field that integrates a broader range of epistemological ideas, research approaches, and interpretive strategies for understanding human experiences (2006). Given this epistemological constraint, researchers in the field of language assessment are increasingly relying on qualitative research methodologies in order to investigate issues requiring an examination of content-related variables, such as the effects of test taker characteristics on test performance, the strategies used to respond during assessment tasks, and so on (Ramona, 2011).
Keep in mind that interpretivism is considered to be an ideographic technique of research, with the emphasis on evaluating specific circumstances or occurrences (Kelle, 2006). Consequently, the opinions of a diverse range persons and events may be taken into consideration. Because of this, the meanings of numerous occurrences serve as the information source for the algorithm (Choy, 2014). Lastly, qualitative research allows scientists to gain a better grasp of people’s inner experiences as well as the ways in which their views are shaped by their cultural backgrounds (Ramona, 2011). Therefore, qualitative research may be beneficial in getting insight into the working assumptions of participants in a variety of settings.
4. Research and analysis
The superiority effect in the group proposal provides a vital theoretical background as well as a point of reference for designing intervention techniques to promote cross-cultural emotional communication amongst people of different cultures. In contrast, when it comes to developing intervention measures to increase cross-cultural transmission of emotions, it does not serve as a guidance. Despite the fact that the research is still in its early phases, there is a diverse variety of perspectives (Matsumoto, 2002; Elfenbein & Ambady, 2002a). The following strategies should be used to investigate the impact of dominance on a group in greater depth: There is, of course, the overwhelming might of the entire group. Improve the methods used in the research. For future study on cross-cultural identification of emotional stimuli, it is advised by Matsumoto (2002) that the construct and use of methodologically defensible emotions be used in order to increase the validity of the findings. The internal benefit effect is characterized by the degree to which the emotion recognizer and the emotion expresser share a common cultural or ethnic background or are ethnically similar. The word “inside the group,” on the other hand, refers to a person’s social origins or upbringing. There has evolved a bond between the members of the group based on shared features such as familiarity, proximity, and trust (Tajfel, 1982).
It’s not like this has been the case in the past. However, the social and psychological characteristics of the group’s members were not taken into account. In order to study group dominance effects, researchers must be able to modify social and psychological factors of people who express and recognize emotions, as well as those who express and recognize emotions.. A group of persons with the same ethnic or cultural background A person’s ability to duplicate a specific facial expression was found to be the primary cause of the person’s emotional response in prior investigations. Group members will find it more difficult to employ dominance effects if emotional cues are deliberately repeated. Since people may experience intra-group dominance effects when confronted with spontaneous emotional inputs, additional study is required.
Many people disagree with the notion that a single individual can have a significant impact on a group. Elfenbein and Ambady’s (2002b) meta-analytic strategy for displaying intra-group dominance effects does not perform effectively according to Matsumoto (2002). Matsumoto believes that Elfenbein and Ambady (2002b) should employ a balanced design (a balanced design) rather of an imbalanced design while conducting their research (a imbalanced design). People from varied cultural backgrounds should be able to identify the things that make them feel at peace. When it comes to A and B cultures, for example, people should be able to identify the elements that make them feel balanced. Only those from A culture can see the expressions created by people from B culture in the unbalanced design, and only those from A culture can perceive the sentiments expressed in the design by people from A and B cultures. If Elfenbein and Ambady (2002b) utilize an imbalanced design, the face expression information they provide is not totally comparable, according to Matsumoto (2002a). This indicates that the group dominance effect cannot be measured using the data from the imbalanced design. This problem can be remedied if a more balanced design is utilized.
Second, the degree to which two things are comparable raises an issue. So Matsumoto (2002) feels that Elfenbein and Ambady (2002b) should apply the same qualities of emotional stimulation no matter where they originate from. The strength of facial emotions should match the severity of the words used. FACS (Ekman and Friesen, 1978) may be used to quantify facial expressions in order to obtain the same impact as the same thing, says Matsumoto (2002). The study by Elfenbein and Ambady (2002b) failed to account for the possibility that persons from other cultures may interact with emotional inputs from other cultures, making the findings less credible.
In light of the final question, it appears that the meta-analysis should focus on the stimulus’s clarity. Matsumoto (2002) believes that if there is a dominant impact in the group, several factors will influence how people detect emotions. When it comes to expressing an emotion, it doesn’t matter if the individual expressing it is from the same cultural background as others who identify the emotion. People who employ emotional stimulation need to be better at detecting their own emotions in order to get the most out of it. A dominant impact can’t be proven without considering the group’s ability to adapt to changes in stimulus clarity. The meta-analysis literature by Elfenbein and Ambady was re-examined by Matsumoto and Consolacion (2002) using a balanced approach (2002b). They didn’t apply that design again since they didn’t find significant evidence to support the dominating impact in the group. In a separate study, Matsumoto et al. (2009) looked at the influence of intra-group dominance on emotional inputs like facial expressions. Athens 2004 Olympic gold medalists from the United States and Japan were on display for them to study. These images show the athletes’ three distinct emotions: joy, pain, and awe. Responses were solicited from both American and Japanese participants. In order to determine whether or not an athlete received a medal, images were consulted. The data reveal that there is no advantage for one group over the other in real-life scenarios.
References
Beaupré, M. G., & Hess, U. (2006). An in-group advantage for confidence in emotion recognition judgments: the moderating effect of familiarity with the expression of out group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 16–26.
Beaupré. M. G., & Hess, U. (2005). Cross-cultural emotion recognition among Canadian ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 355–370.
Biehl, M., Matsumoto, D., Ekman, P., Hearn, V., Heider, K., Kudoh, T., & Ton, V. (1997). Matsumoto and Ekman’s Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFEE): reliability data and cross-national differences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 3–21.
Brooks, C. (1994). The sounds of silence. English Journal, 83, 84–86. Carroll, J., & Russell, J. (1997). Facial expressions in Hollywood’s portrayal of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 164–176.
Choy, L. T. (2014). The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: Comparison and complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(4), 99-104.
Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotion in man and animals. London: Murray. Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 19, pp. 207–282). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978). Facial action coding system: investigator’s guide. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press. Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002a). Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition? Psychological Bulletin, 128, 243–249.
Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002b). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 203–235.
Kelle, U. (2006). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: purposes and advantages. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(4), 293-311.
Ramona, S. E. (2011). Advantages and disadvantages of quantitative and qualitative information risk approaches. Chinese Business Review, 10(12).