Name of Student:
Institutional Affiliation:
Course:
Instructor’s Name:
Date:
Abstract
The goal of this study was to study fame experiences and to ask the question effectively: How is fame? What are the ways to deal with these circumstances by individuals? Are paparazzi and fan meetings for famous people encountered a problem? Is the advantage of celebrity experience worth losing secrecy and anonymity, satisfying the high standards of a great time? ‘It must be borne into consideration throughout that retrospective story contain a gloss that may reflect the reshaping of life storyADDIN CSL_CITATION {“citationItems”:[{“id”:”ITEM-1″,”itemData”:{“DOI”:”10.1525/si.2005.28.2.147″,”ISSN”:”0195-6086″,”abstract”:”My thesis is that for most of his career, Erving Goffman was a symbolic interactionist in the Cooley line. The only sustained theoretical structure in Goffman’s work before 1974 follows Cooley’s conjecture of the looking-glass self. Cooley assumed shared awareness, that we “live in the minds of others.” He also realized that shared awareness is virtually invisible in modern societies and proposed pride or shame as the emotions that resulted. Goffman emphasized embarrassment over shame and implied a fourth step beyond Cooley’s three: the management of embarrassment or shame. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life is dense with these emotions. Goffman proposed conceptual definitions of the embarrassment and shared awareness that are central to Cooley’s idea. The conjunction of shared awareness and emotion in Goffman’s examples may be the main feature that arouses reader sympathy. Two hypotheses are formulated here, along with techniques that might be used to test or apply them. CR – Copyright © 2005 Wiley”,”author”:[{“dropping-particle”:””,”family”:”Scheff”,”given”:”Thomas J.”,”non-dropping-particle”:””,”parse-names”:false,”suffix”:””}],”container-title”:”Symbolic Interaction”,”id”:”ITEM-1″,”issue”:”2″,”issued”:{“date-parts”:[[“2005″,”5″,”1″]]},”page”:”147-166″,”publisher”:”Wiley”,”title”:”Looking-Glass Self: Goffman as Symbolic Interactionist”,”type”:”article-journal”,”volume”:”28″},”uris”:[“http://www.mendeley.com/documents/?uuid=c3b410ed-eb07-3bdb-9d15-9d2b4dd4fd9f”]}],”mendeley”:{“formattedCitation”:”(Scheff, 2005)”,”plainTextFormattedCitation”:”(Scheff, 2005)”,”previouslyFormattedCitation”:”(Scheff, 2005)”},”properties”:{“noteIndex”:0},”schema”:”https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/raw/master/csl-citation.json”}(Scheff, 2005), but within these limits, this study documents the experience that contemporary American famous researchers have been told. Goffman separated the front and rear stages. We spend most of our lives on the front stage, where we deliver and perform during our daily lives. The front stage is scenario is like when we go to a dinner party, or a lecture hall, there’s a front stage almost everywhere we act in front of others. Often, we can retreat to live’s backstage where we don’t have to act in these personal spaces. We may be our true self to train and get ready to come back to the front stage.
Background
Interviews with 15 well-known American celebrities have explored the experience of becoming famous. The interviews detail the existential parameters of today’s society. Participants in this research were celebrities of different categories of society: government, law, industry, publishing, sports, music, movies, TV news, and entertainmentADDIN CSL_CITATION {“citationItems”:[{“id”:”ITEM-1″,”itemData”:{“DOI”:”10.1080/07393180216570″,”ISSN”:”15295036″,”abstract”:”The work of Erving Goffman has been influential in media studies, primarily via adaptations of selected concepts like “region”” and “”frame.”” However
