The most important person

The most important person that has helped me succeed throughout my college career is Mrs. Frank. Mrs. Frank is the main teacher that help shape me into the person that I am today. She taught a lot of classes during my high school years and only after graduation did I realize the ways in which she helped direct me to the success that I am currently experiencing today.

Mrs. Frank was always a very positive and caring person. Even though she doesn’t look like it, she has this unique vibe that makes her different. During my first two years in college, I decided to take many non-science classes. I decided on this decision because I thought that I would find it easier to connect with each class by taking a humanities class, (in reality it didn’t matter on what level Mrs. Frank taught).

I am planning on doing a lot of fun things over the spring break. I am going to have a lot of fun, and I will be very full of energy. In fact, I am going to be such a giant hike, I will probably be able to take a month’s worth of walking-around time. Anyway, I have been doing some thinking. What I have been thinking, is that I may make a few bets. There are a lot of things in this world that make me laugh. I will spend my spring break exploring Hawaii with my best friend, Amanda. When we were young she insisted on coming and I didn’t want to spend the whole week without her, but I didn’t know how and I really needed to save my money. Anyway, on my birthday, she gave me a hundred dollars.

That’s when I thought about spending my spring break in Hawaii. I was so surprised because I can even afford a flight either by myself or with Amanda. I told her about my thoughts and she said would like to go to Hawaii but she couldn’t afford it either. It turned out that my hundred dollars could buy what I expected. Amanda said she wasn’t sure that I needed to spend spring break with her. She had a lot of other friends and could go to Hawaii with someone else. I persuaded her to go with me because I know she’s been alone since she moved away, and I would love to spend some time with her.

One song that I can’t stop listening to right now is “The Gambler” by Kenny Rodgers. The song is short but has a strong and vibrant rhythm. I like the way the song sounds like. The song is a blessing to me and this feeling it gives me is what I love and appreciate most in life. The song is about a man giving a son some advice. The best line in this song is “Every gambler knows That the secret to survivin’ Is knowin’ what to throw away and knowin’ what to keep”. I like everything about the song. The melody of it is fantastic, it’s one of those hooks that is so good actually makes you not want to listen to anything else while the song is playing. The beat is great and the lyrics and the message is relevant with my life right now. As each year goes by, I find myself trying to find someone who can teach me lessons so I’m read up on my own knowledge. I try to learn from the song every day. The song reminds me that I move forward with myself and how I should trust my feelings and my gut about a situation. It keeps my feelings in check and tells me to move forward with what I know. I also want to share with you my favorite memory of a song.

The most important thing is

The most important thing is not life, but the good life

Student’s name

Institution

Course

Tutor

Date

Introduction

“The most important thing is not life, but the good life” is a statement that says life is not the most important thing, instead it is living your life with meaning and purpose. Perhaps living a life that is just in society would make my life worth living, but if we do not have a purpose to our lives then we will just be mere physical bodies, having no soul and therefore no meaning. In Greek mythology, Socrates was pointed out as having a good life, and his death was because of how important he thought the most important thing in life was (Corlett, 2018). This essay will investigate and find out what made Socrates’ good life so special. It will also explore why this statement is true. If you live your life with meaning and purpose, then your life is worth living because it gives you a reason to keep be alive.

Argument supporting the thesis

Thesis statement: If you live your life with meaning and purpose, then your life is worth living because it gives you a reason to keep be alive. Socrates refused to make decisions himself, however he would rather ask somebody else who could make a better decision than him. It is because of this, that one day Socrates would shortly question what it is that makes life so special anyway? “The most important thing is not life, but the good life”. Socrates believed that if you lead your life with purpose and meaning then you were living the good life. He had the ‘Golden Mean’ theory. This theory is one where a person chooses to be morally and ethically good rather than being bad (Corlett, 2018). Socrates believed that this was the best way to do things because it was considered a golden mean where there is no excess or deficiency in good morals. This is always going to be right because it has no excess or deficiency of virtues, therefore it can never end up being wrong in any situation.

Assessment of objections

There are many objections that can be raised against this argument. One is that if we all lived the good life we would have no progression in society. This is because everyone would be too busy doing good to do anything else, therefore nothing would be done. If everybody did what was right and proper then it would not result in any harm because there will be no excess or deficiency of virtues, therefore nothing will ever go wrong. However, it could lead to a breakdown of society because people just do not want to do what is morally good anymore and always want more things.

Conclusion

Socrates believed that the most important thing in life is knowledge, which means that there are a lot more things in life that are of consequence than just one’s physical health. Knowledge is a matter of inquiry, which means it has to be investigated by way of searching. It is of utmost importance to one’s good life (Vallor, 2018). In order to properly understand Socrates’ theory, one must first comprehend what he means by “good”. He is saying that if a person knows what they are doing, and they do it as a service to others or themselves as a result of doing what they want, then they are achieving the good life.Reference

Corlett, J. A. (2018). Legal Obligation in Plato’s Crito. In Interpreting Plato Socratically (pp. 133-168). Springer, Cham.

Vallor, S. (2018). An introduction to data ethics. Course module.) Santa Clara, CA: Markkula Center for Applied Ethics.

The most likely diagnosis

Based on the presentation and PE, what do you think is the most likely diagnosis?

The most likely diagnosis would be Basal cell carcinoma. The diagnosis was made because the bump occurred in an area that is usually exposed to the sun and its UV lights. Basal cell carcinoma is usually characterized by a waxy or pearly bump. The cancer is also characterized by bleeding that returns. To confirm the diagnosis, a skin biopsy is required for testing to determine if the skin has cancer.

Briefly discuss the guideline for sun exposure protection to decrease skin cancer.

The risk of skin cancer is increased with increased exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light. The sun, though important for stress reduction and as a source of vitamin D, it is also a source of UV light. Although the amount of UV light is more during summer, it can occur all year round. The amount also varies during the day with the peak hours being around 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. There is a UV index that categorizes the different levels of UV. UV light amount can also be forecasted such that people can make arrangements about how to protect their skin from high levels of UV light. Usually, protection is required for UV light above 3 according to the UV index. There are various ways through which the skin can be protected from extreme exposure the first one being sheltering. Staying indoors or under a shelter limits the amount of UV light that reaches the skin. The type of clothing also affects the amount of UV light that reaches the skin. Usually, long-sleeved shirts and long skirts and pants offer more protection. On the other hand, dark-colored clothes also offer more protection than light-colored clothes. For additional safety especially when the UV light is elevated is to use hats and sunglasses. Additionally, different types of sunscreens could also protect from UV light.

The Meaning of Progress

Name:

Course:

Instructor:

Date:

The Meaning of Progress

The essay discusses the Tennessee rural community where Dubois got his first teaching position. Dubois had just graduated from school and was actively looking for a town in dire need of a teacher. He met a homely girl, Josie, aged about twenty. Josie enthusiastically oriented him, telling Dubois “that she longed to learn.” The families only take their children to the schoolhouse for lessons when they are not required to participate in farming or assist in house duties, and Dubois stays with all of them. Dubois’s attention is mostly drawn to Josie as she has a bright mind, committed to her studies, more importantly, passionate to join school one day in Nashville city. Those things qualify Josie to be part of the Talented Tenth that Dubois advocated getting access to higher education. In the essay, Dubois treat race and racial problems as an object of philosophical consideration (Gooding-Williams, Np). This paper clearly explains what Dubois thinks concerning Progress for rural African Americans communities during his time and whether or not the Progress was worth fighting.

As per the essay, Dubois went back to Tennessee town ten years later and learned that his old schoolhouse was demolished, and instead, an ugly new building was in place, not to mention the much-transformed lives of the people he had known. Dubois continued to stroll around the town, visiting some farms of his former students, among them, Ben and Tildy. Perhaps, Dubois did not rate them highly, but surprisingly, they were among the most financially stable people in the town. To make the matter worse, Dubois found that Josie died following the relentless sacrifices that she made to her broken family irrespective of their mistakes and misfortunes. Reflecting how he was inspired by the place a decade earlier, Dubois says, “How shall man measure Progress there where the dark-faced Josie lies?… How hard a thing is a life to the lowly, and yet how human and real!” (Rodrigues, Pg. 2). Dubois held that it was a prerequisite for them to study, and they had to investigate and solve. Perhaps, the world could more but not human interest or moral conviction; thus, despite the possible unpleasantness, what should always prevail is heart-quality of fairness and an earnest desire.

Dubois is somewhat relentlessly focused on the aftermath effects of exposing the truth. Perhaps, they cannot deny that indeed Dubois how influential the propaganda can be, since, as an activist, sociologist, curator, philosopher, among others, engaged himself in propaganda politics either willfully or happily. Dubois endorsed propaganda practices as he viewed it as a significant criterion for a “stripped and silent” group of people to employ (Rodrigues, Pg. 3). Regarding the Dubois articulation of propaganda, there are three notable moments in his career where they consider the functionality and purpose of propaganda.

Dubois’s analysis of social problems, more specifically, his diagnosis of the nature of Negro problems, shows his social construction accounts for racial injustices. Dubois fought the moral significance of social inquiry, which all together played a significant role in ultimately achieving what he called “evolving program for Negro freedom” (Gooding-Williams, Np). He objectively regards the Negro issues from a perspective of lived experience and thinks that he can liberate his community. He defines the social problem as “the failure of an organized social group to realize its group ideals, through the inability to adapt a certain desired line of action to the given condition of life.” Dubois gives one example where he thinks the organized social group has failed to enact a luxurious home life ideal as a result of customs that prevail in marriages. Also, crime and lawlessness have come due to failure to impose economic and social development ideals.

The evolution of Negro problems has been a “baffling adjustment of action and condition, which is the essence of progress” (Gooding-Williams, Np). Dubois considers the existing social issues have been mainly orchestrated by many failures, such as disregarding the incorporation of the Negro communities as part of the American people. The most notable losses, according to him, were racial discrimination and prejudice towards the African American people and the backwardness of the black culture. according to the essay, “people of Negro blood should not be admitted into the group life of the nation no matter what their condition maybe” (Gooding-Williams, Np). By cultural backwardness, Dubois meant that African Americans were economically disadvantaged, and at least a defective organized social life. He primarily thought that through his influence, he could air all these issues and help to make the society at least good if not better. Perhaps, racial prejudice is one lagging indicator that has accounted for Negro problems since they are entirely ignored regarding their social and economic well-being.

Dubois felt that the Negro Problem was subject to scientific inquiry. He states, “strivings of the Negro People” (Gooding-Williams, Np). as a way to adduce the double-consciousness concept for the characterization of the subjectively lived experience of social problems of African America. Dubois double- consciousness characterization appears as a “sense of always looking at oneself through the eyes of the others, of measuring one’s soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity” (Gooding-Williams, Np). According to Dubois, African Americans often regard themselves as worth pitying and displaying a feeling of intense dislike when with racist whites who are among the leading causes of the Negro problem. Dubois has extensively covered the concept of double-consciousness concept in his literary works, which did receive substantial attention from different scholars while at the same time facing some contemporary philosophical disputes concerning the significance of the idea.

Dubois’s life is full of remarkable events. He was the first African American to pursue and graduate a doctorate program at Harvard. He was a civil rights champion and the founder of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). Dubois choose to define Progress based on the humble narrative of Tennessee village instead of other story starry exploits. The essay focuses on the incompleteness of the Progress, where schools and farms are experiencing growth, but people’s lives are slipping through the cracks. Josie dies at the expense of her family, not to mention the incarceration of Jim as opposed to society promoting his potential. The town is in good shape and more prosperous, while the vast majority of the families were unstable.

Dubois’s explanation of the term progress is somewhat similar to today. A significant number of politicians offer racing tips on record lows in African American unemployment as Progress. Of course, it can be regarded as Progress, but it was still the case for Burke Farm and Jim’s underemployment. Just like the case for Josie, Jim, and the Burkes against the Jim Crow, there exist little or no service jobs that could resolve the systemic racism. Raw employment numbers could not answer to mass incarceration, biasness, and gaps. The successes were barely accommodation in the system of whichever the time. To achieve substantial and meaningful justice, it requires mechanisms that should be put in place to eradicate institutions, laws, and norms that advocate injustice acts. According to Dubois, two conditions should be satisfied for politics to fit and be in a position to respond to Jim Crow Laws of racial apartheid.

Works Cited

Gooding-Williams, Robert. “WEB Du Bois.” (2017).

Rodrigues, Donald T. ” Of the Meaning of Progress”: DuBoisian Double Consciousness, Propaganda, and the Rhetoric of Scientific Racism. Diss. Vanderbilt University, 2013.

The Minimum Legal Drinking Age of 21 as a Policy Problem

The Minimum Legal Drinking Age of 21 as a Policy Problem

Student’s name

Institutional affiliation

The Minimum Legal Drinking Age of 21 as a Policy Problem

Introduction

Target audience: scholars and policy designers, and implementers

The legal minimum drinking age is 21 years across all 50 US states, although there are exceptions to this rule. Exceptions include medical reasons, basic consumption and under adult supervision. The legal age for purchasing alcohol varied from state to state before enacting the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984. Some reasons cited for having the legal drinking age as 21 include reduced motor vehicle crashes and protecting users from adverse birth outcomes, drug dependence, and homicide and suicide. While the outcomes of having 21 as the minimum legal drinking age benefit health, there is a policy gap as it only pushes underage individuals to binge drink (Fell & Scherer, 2017). Maintaining the legal drinking age of 21 does not guarantee that 18-year-olds will not drink as it only results in drinking in less controlled environments.

Analysis

The only alternative to the MLDA law is reducing the legal drinking age to 18 years. Having 18 as the minimum drinking age has pros and cons. One advantage is that it would help reduce binge drinking. This follows the belief that when young people have easier access to alcohol, they will not have the thrill of drinking excessively granted an opportunity. This is because they do not have to deal with hiding or obtaining fake IDs. Another pro is that it creates a much safer drinking environment as individuals are likely to call higher authorities such as the police in case of an emergency situation like alcohol poisoning (Carpenter & Dobkin, 2017). On the downside, lowering the legal drinking age to 18 is not advisable as a person’s brain is not fully developed by then. Alcohol interferes with the brain development process. It would also increase irresponsible drinking behavior as eighteen-year-olds are usually not as experienced.

Recommendation

To resolve the minimum legal drinking age dilemma in the United States, the ideal solution is to reduce the minimum drinking age to 18 years. Policy designers and implementers must push for having 18 years as the minimum drinking age and comparing outcomes. This would be the best solution because it would give society a chance to witness, document, and compare the actual outcomes of having 18 and 21 years as minimum legal requirements. Reducing the legal drinking age would be the right move as we would see reduced cases of road fatalities. After all, the United States has more drunken driving-related fatalities than countries with 18 years are its minimum legal drinking age.

Implementation

Various steps must be followed to implement the policy of 18 years as the minimum legal drinking age. The first step is identifying a need which in this case is reducing the legal drinking age from 21 to 18 years. The next step would be appointing an individual or team to lead responsibility, such as a committee. Step three has to do with collecting information and step four is drafting the policy (Zainal, 2020). In step five, consultation with appropriate stakeholders takes place, and in the next step, the policy is finalized. Then, it is considered whether procedures are required to provide guidance on how the policy shall be implemented. For instance, procedures for collecting and addressing complaints and who will handle them. The next step is implementing the policy itself, and this includes supporting the policy implementers. The final step is all monitoring, reviewing, and revising.

References

Carpenter, C., & Dobkin, C. (2017). The minimum legal drinking age and morbidity in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(1), 95-104.

Fell, J. C., & Scherer, M. (2017). Estimation of the potential effectiveness of lowering the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for driving from 0.08 to 0.05 grams per deciliter in the United States. Alcoholism: clinical and experimental research, 41(12), 2128-2139.

Zainal, A. G. (2020). Requirement and Difficulties to Implement the Policy Lifecycle Model for Systems Management. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6s), 472-478.

The Media Dependency Theory

Name

Professor

Course

Date

The Media Dependency TheoryThe media system dependency theory also referred to as media dependency theory was advanced by two individuals in the mid twentieth century and the proponents were Sandra Ball-Rokeach and Melvin Defleur. The theory is believed to have emerged in 1976 with its main arguments based in classical sociological information that suggested that the media and those who consume it could not be studied in isolation of the larger social systems in the society. The theory is used in explaining the links that exist between the mass media, individuals’ consumers of the mass media and the existing social systems in the society. The media system dependency theory is based on the hypothesis that, ‘the more an individual depends of the media in meeting their needs, the more the media becomes useful in that individual’s life, and hence the more influence the media will have in defining the lifestyle of such a person.’

The media system dependency theory is based on the relationships that exist between the society, media and the individual persons. The understanding of these relationships is important in understanding how the theory is applicable in reality. The first relationship is between the society and the media. In creating an effective relationship between the society and media, proponents of this theory believe that the critical issues involved are accessibility and availability of media channels to the society. The media dependence developed based on societal systems varies significantly from one societal system to another based on the different economic, political and cultural setups that exist. For instance, many people across the United States currently depend on social media platforms as source of information due to the easy availability of social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram. When it is compared to less developed countries where internet penetration is limited, people are likely to depend on the mainstream media especially radio and internet as a source of information.

Another relationship that is involved in the media dependency theory involves the relationship between the audience and the media. The relationship that is developed between the media and audience determines how useful the media is likely to be to the people based on the opportunities that exist to the people as a result of the relationship. The relationship between the media channels and the audience determines how the people use the media and it is different across different media systems. The more relevant the information provided by media systems to the audience the higher the dependency of the audience on the media system hence the stronger motivation for people to seek information from the media system. This therefore increases the probability of the media system to impact more on the people and the audience becoming larger.

In the media dependency theory, there is the relationship between the society and the audience. Proponents of this theory argue that the society in which audiences are determines the media consumer’s needs and reasons for using it. The society is also essential in the relationship as it is responsible for the creation of values, knowledge systems, norms and rules and regulations that guide media access, availability and use. At times, the social systems within a particular society can perform functions of the media through the modification of the norms, knowledge, values and laws that regulate the conduct of people. The society within which a media system is found determines what the media can offer to its audience. For instance many people across the United States have preference for technology and automobiles and this shapes what media outlets provide to their audience. If the media does not provide what the audience prefers, they are likely to lose viewership hence low influence on the audience while the media that focuses on audience interests is likely to get more viewership hence more influence on the behavior of its audience.

The developers of the media dependency theory, Ball-Rokeach and DeFleur identified the three needs that they believed shaped the importance a person associates with a media at any particular moment. The first need they identified is the need for people to get an understanding of their social world or simply for surveillance purposes. The two believed that people value any media depending on how useful it is for them to get an in-depth understanding of their social world. This was based on the fact that the media is used by many people as a way of surveillance of their surroundings. People who are interested in sporting activities become attracted to media channels that provide them with news on the sporting activities they develop dependency on such media compared to media channels that focus on political news that they might not be interested in.

The second media need that the developers of the media system dependency theory believed determine how useful a media is to people is based on the need and desire by people to act effectively and meaningfully. This is also considered the social utility aspect of the media to users. The media dependency theory holds that if people realize that the media is able to guide them to act effective and meaningful, they get attracted to that media channel and become dependent on it. This increases the chances that the media will influence how people will act. When people find a media source reliable in providing them with the necessary information that they need to make meaningful and effective decisions, they will develop dependency on such media. For instance if the public realizes that CNN provides reliable information when it comes to impending natural disasters like the tsunami or hurricane, they develop a reliance on CNN reporting on natural disasters.

The media dependency theory proponents argue that the media becomes relevant to the audience depending on how it is able to help them escape reality when it becomes unbearable. People are often attracted to media channels that allow them to evade the harsh reality and escape to their own imaginary environment commonly known as fantasy-escape.

The media is important in influencing people during times of conflict or social change, as it is an essential source of knowledge and information on the topic. The media influences agenda setting, by allowing the public to get the information that they need. When the needs of the people are high and people find it difficult to achieve them, more people turn to media as a way of meeting their needs hence there are higher chances for the media to have influence on them. This has been defined as the social and solitary play when individuals find media as a way of relaxing and evading troubling circumstances. For instance, people who find it relaxing to watch a movie when tired or bored are liked to be dependent on a media that allows them access to relaxing content like movies and sporting activities. During hurricane Katrina, the US public relied on media reporting to get updates on the situation. Most of the information that was available to the public was only limited to media reporting and this created a sense on dependency on the media.

Media system dependency theory is essential in driving multi-disciplinary studies. It has been used as a theoretical basis for understanding various relationships that have developed between the media, society and individuals over the years. Such relationships explain the interrelationships that exist in the society and how they are shaping it.

The Miranda Act

The Mirtanda Act

Name

Institution

Date of submission

The Miranda Act

The Miranda act is a set of specific rights that anyone under police custody is entitled to. It is considered as standard police procedure as police officers are required to recite these laws to a suspect under custody. Miranda warnings are given verbally during an arrest and on paper when a written confession is being taken. It is made up of four parts being; An individual’s right to remain silent, any statements made may be used as evidence against them in a court of law, the individual’s right to an attorney and if the individual cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for them before questioning, if so desired.

The Miranda act originates from a 1966 supreme court ruling Miranda v. Arizona (1966) under chief justice Earl Warren (Miranda, 1966). He released a 60 paged written opinion outlining a police procedure that would ensure all suspects are informed of their rights during arrests and before being interrogated Under this act, unless this warning is given to a suspect, no evidence or information obtained during questioning can be used against the suspect, nor can it be viable in a court of law. The Miranda act is meant to protect a suspect’s Fifth Amendment right so as to eliminate self-incrimination during interrogations.

This act is based on the belief that during interrogations, there is such pressure on the suspects that undermines their will to resist speaking where otherwise they would not, therefore making it hard for one to exercise their constitutional rights. The Miranda rights are meant to reconcile the power police officers have with the basic rights of an individual. It gives a suspect the power to make informed decisions on whether or not to waiver their rights as given to them by the constitution.

However the act has had some limitations one being that a police officer is not required to explain these rights to the suspect, nor the consequences of waiving such rights, hence most suspects are unable to fully grasp the importance of these rights, limiting their ability to exercise it. Another limitation is that the Miranda act almost has no impactful difference in a police interrogations and behavior, as the police continue to use psychological tactics in getting confessions such as the use of threats and promises to induce suspects into signing waiver forms and confessions. Many police departments have also been giving training to their officers on how to carry out interrogations with regards to this act, hence finding deceptive ways of influencing suspects to waive their rights (Miranda & Arizona,). A classic example of such a scenario is when police officers persuade suspects that they are better off giving their statements to a friendly police officer rather than wait for an unsympathetic public attorney

Despite all these challenges the Miranda act has been able to bring about a balance that enables for the protection of essential constitutional rights of suspects without law enforcement agencies having to prove the legitimacy of the confessions they submit, as the evidence they collect holds up in courts. The Miranda act has therefore been very influential in ensuring all American people enjoy their freedom, as police officers are able to do their job without infringing the fundamental rights of all citizens. It is after all one of the fundamental American rights.

References

“50 years since Miranda vs. Arizona case argued at Supreme Court,” March 1, 2016, azcentral.

Miranda v Arizona, 384 u.s. 436 [1966])

Miranda v. Arizona, Justia U.S. Supreme Court.

The Media

Student’s name

Professor

Course

Date

The Media

Media simply refers to the excessive amounts of information that is transmitted through television, radio, and other types of mass communication. This includes the stories and images that are pushed out by any form of media outlet. The messages that are being relayed by the media can vary greatly depending on what type it is. For example, a story about a car accident would have a much different effect when it was told on Facebook versus in an article for USA Today. Furthermore, no matter what type of media it may be, people tend to misinterpret what they hear or see from outlets and take those messages at face value without doing any independent research themselves (Market Business News, 1).

Digital media such as the Internet allows for a direct connection with the source of information, which gives people more insight into the matter. “Media” can refer to a variety of things, for example writing, the mass communications system in society, an individual’s life outside of work, or a way of thinking about social problems. Media effects can be divided into two types: direct and indirect. Direct media effects occur when exposure to media causes changes directly related to what is being presented in that medium. This is also referred to as mediated or interactive effects.

There are various issues that arise with the media, but tis post is only going to focus on two here: ethical issues and intrusions with privacy. The media is divided into several different categories, such as forms of advertising, mainstream news and editorial opinion, film and television programming, radio broadcasts, and social media. These types are almost always regulated by a set of rules which must be met in order for them to use open spaces for their marketing. In regards to privacy issues that arise from this unregulated medium; there has not been much research done on the subject so it is difficult to come up with a concrete definition or policy. However, what we see is an increasing number of individuals who are trying to establish terms concerning how an individual’s privacy should be protected online.

Media’s ethical issues arise from a number of different aspects. There is the issue of financial gain, in which case the media will usually remain objective in order to avoid any conflict of interest. However, there are other areas that ethical issues can arise from, such as product endorsement and advertisement(Rao, Akash, 30). An example of an ethical issue drawn out by this is when the media takes an interest in certain brands or products because they are being endorsed by someone in the public eye. Another example is when news producers seem to get more pleasure out of showing pornographic content rather than things that truly matter like, politics or current events.

The main ethical concern that arises from the media relates to privacy. With the use of social media and internet to communicate, people no longer feel safe at home. Because of this, people are using social media as a way of finding out what’s going on in the world or even just checking up on themselves. For instance, a Facebook user took to Twitter in an attempt to find out if there was a local news station broadcasting his home. While there is an ethical issue here, it’s important that we look at it with more than just our own interests in mind (Rao, Akash, 34). Although we wouldn’t want anyone spying on us while we are doing something personal, other people want this same access too. Because of this, there shouldn’t be a hard set of rules put in place that can prevent the public from what they want.

Work Cited

“What Is Media? Definition And meaning”. Market Business News, 2022, https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/media-definition-meaning/. Accessed 11 Mar 2022.

Rao, Akash. “Ethical Issues with Social Media Business Practices: Motivation, Consequences, and Character Formation.” (2021).

The median voter theorem asserts that in a voting system where the majority determines the winner, then the outcome is determ

The median voter theorem asserts that in a voting system where the majority determines the winner, then the outcome is determined by the median voter. The main assumption underlying the theorem is that voters put the candidates in a one-dimensional spectrum and that there are two main parties in the election. The United States has the Republican and Democratic Party as the two main political parties in competition; hence the median voter theorem is applicable in this case. Using this strategy, a candidate tries to identify the median voter in their area and appeal to them so that they can get the maximum number of votes and consequently win.

When moving from a primary to a general election, candidates can sometimes change their position as they try to appeal to more voters. The reason for this is that the general election has more voters from diverse backgrounds and with different beliefs. In a primary election, it is easier to determine if the median voter is liberal or conservative, although people usually have varied opinions depending on the issue at hand. However, at the general election level, they have to appeal to more people hence they can change their position or express it differently. Bernie Sanders was one of the presidential candidates in the 2016 election. Most of his policies resonate with the median voter; hence I would say that he followed the median voter. Bernie behaved both ethically and strategically. The middle class makes up the majority of voters and by appealing to them, he appealed to the median voter. Ethically, he addressed many of the issues facing the majority of voters which he has always championed for since his early years.

The Medicated Child

The Medicated Child

Student’s Name

Institution Of Affiliation

Instructor

Course

Date

The Medicated Child

The issue of bipolar disorder has been a problem in the American society for a long time. A lot of people have been diagnosed as depressed and having psychotic issues and one of the most rampant issues that have been making parents worried is the issue if their children developing bipolar disorders when they are so young and still developing. Because of this, parents have become worried and they have tried different types of medications to prevent their children from becoming fully bipolar. Some of these medications have worked while others have not been able to work because according to doctors, children are still developing and the drugs which are used are the drugs for adults and they do not affect children the same way that they affect the young children (Barlow et al, 2020). It is a difficult situation because even the doctors seem to be not aware of what kind of medication to give to them children to do away with the psychiatric diseases that afflict them. This is from a documentary called ‘The Medicated Child’ by PBS frontline that was produced on 8th January 2008 and seeks to illuminate the issue of children not getting medication for the different diseases they might have and in particular focus towards the high amount of medicine given to children instead of psychotherapy and the manner in which these medications affect the children. This paper discusses the documentary and gives insights towards what it presents.

Firstly, the documentary presents the cases of different children who have been diagnosed with symptoms that are related to bipolar disorder and the cases are discussed in a very good way as even the doctors of the children are even interviewed. This presents the information in a very clear and straightforward or even investigative manner (The Medicated Child, 2018). This kind of information presentation makes the information presented more trustworthy and believable and it is directly from the people involved into the different cases of children who were being treated for such disorders. Parents are also interviewed and their emotions and love for their children make the documentary emotional. The parents of Jacob are presented as one who had a lot of difficulty when it came to their child Jacob. He was a good healthy kid but later as he was growing developed problems after his first three years. However, his teachers at school complained of hypersensitivity and even though the parents of Jacob were reluctant to take him to a doctor because to them he seemed perfectly normal the teachers continued to insist. According to the documentary this is one of the worries or issues that make American society spend a lot of money on treating very little conditions or even conditions that never existed and actually develop a serious problem from the medication from a problem that did not exist.

After Jacobs parents took him to hospital, he was diagnosed with attention deficit hyper activity disorder. This was after they had resisted taking him to hospital for almost a year. This condition forced them to begin medication for Jacob who to them seemed perfectly normal. Therefore, they began the medications and that medication led to another condition and after that they had to take another medication that was to deal with the side effect of the second medication (The Medicated Child, 2018). The story of medication seemed to continue growing and every time they wanted to him to have a normal life there was a medication he was supposed to be taking. This was a difficult situation for them because as his father describes the situation, its like taking a lot of medications just to treat a disease that has been caused by the other medication that was taken and it was too much for them. In fact, they decided at one point to just stop all the medications because it was too much and maybe even nothing. They were very worried of the effects the medications had on their little child and they had to do everything within their ability to make the medication go away.

Not only the case of Jacob, other cases are presented in the documentary and they are quite astonishing because children are given very heavy medication when they are a very young and this to some extent affects their development and growth. In fact, deducing from the examples and the cases given as well as the views of the different doctors who present their points of view for the documentary, it might be true that some medications for the cases presented were completely unnecessary. The best thing that could have been done would have been to see a psychologist and make sure that the psychologist tries to understand the behaviors of the children and try to modify them (Crego et al, 2020). It is also concerning how the doctors even state that the medications that they gave to some of the children were just try and error because there were no drugs developed for kids. What is even more disconcerting is the fact that these doctors preferred to use medications they were not fully aware of their effects on children for treatment of the conditions instead of preferring a better way like psychological methods.

The film therefore is an overall point of view and there is no bias since all the sides are involved and they all present their ideas as to what they believe is the right thing and what could have been done better as well as the way forward. The documentary even goes ahead to bring in the governmental body in charge of medications and ask them about medications for children and why doctors keep prescribing drugs that they are not sure about. The response is that the medication for young children is tricky because its effects are not static but rather varied since children keep developing and medicine affect them differently. The purpose of the documentary seems to inform and make parents aware of the issues that take place in the medical world so as to enable them to take the necessary precautions for their children. The sources of the documentary are narrator, parents, personal doctors, university and other researchers, FDA researchers and doctors, the children and other people involved in the cases of the children.

The parents seem more effective and able to communicate more effectively since they are not just stating the facts but they are narrating the events with some kind of emotional attachment and that is to their children. Therefore, they seem more convincing that the medication they were being given even though understood to be of good help seemed more harmful than helpful to their children. The film does not differ in any great from what I have learnt (Gershon et al, 2020). This is because all the facts presented are medical facts and personal stories which are manifestations of how some things like medication affect the behavior of a person or even change it.

In conclusion, the medication that were given to the different children cases presented in the documentary seem to have affected the behaviour of the children in a great way. However, this is not everything since some of the medications have actually worked and helped the children get better. The documentary is informative and it is an important thing to be looked at and researched so that proper medication for the different psychiatric diseases for children are developed.

References

Barlow, D. H., Ellard, K. K., Cummings, J. A., Deleurme, K., & Campoli, J. (2020). 4.1 Anxiety and Related Disorders. Abnormal Psychology.

Crego, C., Widiger, T., Cummings, J. A., & Strauss, C. (2020). 9.1 Personality Disorders. Abnormal Psychology.

Gershon, A., Thompson, R., & Cummings, J. A. (2020). 3.1 Mood Disorders. Abnormal Psychology.

The Medicated Child. (2018). FRONTLINE. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/medicatedchild/